G.Skill
DDR5 · 6000 MT/s · CL30 · 2×16GB
Lowest price in US across retailers
Last updated Oct 12, 2026
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB price history in US: current low $515.99, 12-month low $312.43, 12-month median $688.52.
Price history is aggregated from tracked listings at Newegg.
Fair price — current price is 3% above the 3-month median.
Price history is aggregated from tracked listings at Newegg.
Ripjaws S5 is G.Skill's low-profile, no-lighting alternative sitting alongside its RGB-heavy Trident Z5 kits — same DDR5 platform, aimed at builds where clearance under a tall air cooler matters more than an illuminated stack. The two capacities on offer here share a single speed grade.
This is the 2×16GB option, 32GB total, rated 6000 MT/s CL30. Since this family doesn't spread across multiple speed bins, the practical question when comparing kits is capacity rather than timing — both listings run the same 6000 MT/s rating with the same CL30.
It is UDIMM for consumer desktop boards. As with any DDR5 kit, the rated speed depends on enabling the appropriate XMP or EXPO profile in BIOS rather than the default JEDEC clock.
Flare X5 is a heatspreader-only DDR5-6000 line built for clearance-constrained builds, and within this 6000 MT/s grade every listing shares that one headline speed — the CL bin and capacity are the only things actually separating listings.
FURY Beast at 6000 spans three CL grades under one name plus a four-module 64GB option its 5600 sibling doesn't offer, which makes matching the exact SKU more important here than with most families.
DDR5 doubled the bandwidth and moved power regulation onto the module. Whether that is worth paying for depends entirely on which platform you are building.
Crucial Pro trades looks for a compatibility-first, overclocking-headroom pitch, and within this 6400 MT/s grade, CAS latency -- not the shared headline speed -- is the number that actually separates one listing from another.
16 GB is no longer comfortable, 32 GB is the sensible default, and 64 GB is a workload decision rather than a future-proofing one.
Capacity avoids stutter caused by running out of memory; speed affects how efficiently the CPU feeds data to the GPU. They solve different problems, and buying enough of the first one before spending on the second is the right order.