Skip to content

Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 vs G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18

Best value: G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18

Best value of the 2 kits compared is the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18, at $8.281/GB β€” it is the only kit here that is both priced and in stock, which makes it the default pick until the others return.

Price per GB
$13.125
Best price
Out of stock
Capacity
16GB
Modules
2Γ—8GB
Speed
4,000 MT/sβœ“
Latency
9.0 nsβœ“
Key specs advantage

Comparable or lower specs

vs
Price per GB
$8.281βœ“
Best price
$265.00βœ“
Capacity
32GBβœ“
Modules
2Γ—16GB
Speed
4,000 MT/s
Latency
9.0 ns
Key specs advantage
+100% Capacity (32GB vs 16GB)
+58% Price per GB ($8.281 vs $13.125)

Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 vs G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18: full breakdown

Value: price per gigabyte

The G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18 is the only kit here that is both in stock and priced, working out to $8.281/GB. Out-of-stock kits are excluded from the price winner, which leaves Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 out of the ranking above.

Capacity and module layout

The Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 is 2x8GB and the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18 is 2x16GB. Total capacity runs from 16GB on the Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 to 32GB on the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18 β€” 100% more memory. All of them ship as matched multi-module sets, so each populates at least two channels out of the box; on a four-slot board that still leaves room to add capacity later.

Speed and latency

Clocks and timings: the Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 at 4,000 MT/s CL18 and the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18 at 4,000 MT/s CL18. True latency is level across every kit that publishes it, at 9 ns, so real-world latency is not what separates them.

Current price against MSRP

Current listings: the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18 at $265.00. Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 is out of stock, so its price is the last recorded rather than something you can pay today. No MSRP is on file for any of these kits, so street price is the only reference point.

Which of these 2 kits should you buy?

Buy the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18. It is the cheapest per gigabyte of the 2 kits compared at $8.281/GB, and it is in stock, which is the whole question price per GB is meant to settle. If raw speed matters more to you than cost per gigabyte, the Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18 is the faster kit at 4,000 MT/s β€” expect to pay for it. That recommendation ignores Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18, which is out of stock.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Capacity & Modules

Capacity & Modules comparison between Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
SpecificationCrucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
Total capacity16GB32GBβœ“
Module layout2Γ—8GB2Γ—16GB
Module count22
Form factorUDIMMUDIMM
Categorydesktopdesktop

Speed & Latency

Speed & Latency comparison between Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
SpecificationCrucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Speed4,000 MT/sβœ“4,000 MT/s
CAS latencyCL18βœ“CL18
True latency9.0 nsβœ“9.0 ns

Features

Features comparison between Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
SpecificationCrucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
ECC supportNoNo
RGB lightingYesYes

Pricing & Value

Pricing & Value comparison between Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
SpecificationCrucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x8GB 4000 CL18G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB CL18
MSRPβ€”β€”
Best priceOut of stock$265.00βœ“
Price per GB$13.125$8.281βœ“

← Build a different comparison