Skip to content

G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB

No in-stock value winner across 2 kits

No value winner: every one of the 2 kits compared is out of stock, so none of their price-per-GB figures is a price you can actually pay today. On specs, the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB clocks highest at 8,000 MT/s.

Price per GB
β€”
Best price
Out of stock
Capacity
32GBβœ“
Modules
2Γ—16GB
Speed
6,800 MT/s
Latency
10.0 ns
Key specs advantage
+12% CAS latency (CL34 vs CL38)
No listingsNo offers found for this kit in GB.
vs
Price per GB
Β£76.406βœ“
Best price
Out of stock
Capacity
32GB
Modules
2Γ—16GB
Speed
8,000 MT/sβœ“
Latency
9.5 nsβœ“
Key specs advantage
+18% Speed (8,000 MT/s vs 6,800 MT/s)
+5% True latency (9.5ns vs 10.0ns)

G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB: full breakdown

Value: price per gigabyte

There is no price-per-GB winner in this comparison: every kit is out of stock, and an out-of-stock price is not a value. On the last prices recorded, the figures were G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB at Β£76.406/GB. No usable price is on file for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB, so it cannot be ranked on price per GB at all.

Capacity and module layout

The G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB is 2x16GB and the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is 2x16GB. Every kit here totals 32GB, so capacity is not the deciding factor. All of them ship as matched multi-module sets, so each populates at least two channels out of the box; on a four-slot board that still leaves room to add capacity later.

Speed and latency

Clocks and timings: the G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB at 6,800 MT/s CL34 and the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB at 8,000 MT/s CL38. The G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB clocks highest at 8,000 MT/s, 18% above the G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB at 6,800 MT/s. True latency, where lower is better, favours the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB at 9.5 ns against 10 ns on the G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB. That is the figure that settles a higher-CAS-at-higher-clock argument; MT/s or CAS on its own does not.

Current price against MSRP

G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB are out of stock, so those prices are the last recorded rather than something you can pay today. No MSRP is on file for any of these kits, so street price is the only reference point.

Which of these 2 kits should you buy?

No recommendation today: every one of the 2 kits compared is out of stock, and a price-per-GB figure nobody can pay is not a value. On paper the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is the quickest at 8,000 MT/s, so it is the one to watch for. Wait for stock before committing β€” the price-per-GB order can change the moment one of them is listed again.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Capacity & Modules

Capacity & Modules comparison between G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
Total capacity32GBβœ“32GB
Module layout2Γ—16GB2Γ—16GB
Module count22
Form factorUDIMMUDIMM
Categorydesktopdesktop

Speed & Latency

Speed & Latency comparison between G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
Memory typeDDR5DDR5
Speed6,800 MT/s8,000 MT/sβœ“
CAS latencyCL34βœ“CL38
True latency10.0 ns9.5 nsβœ“

Features

Features comparison between G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
ECC supportNoNo
RGB lightingNoYes

Pricing & Value

Pricing & Value comparison between G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6800 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
MSRPβ€”β€”
Best priceOut of stockOut of stock
Price per GBβ€”Β£76.406βœ“

← Build a different comparison