Skip to content

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB

No in-stock value winner across 2 kits

No value winner: every one of the 2 kits compared is out of stock, so none of their price-per-GB figures is a price you can actually pay today. On specs, the G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB clocks highest at 4,266 MT/s.

Price per GB
CA$41.813
Best price
Out of stock
Capacity
32GBβœ“
Modules
2Γ—16GB
Speed
4,000 MT/s
Latency
8.0 ns
Key specs advantage
+6% CAS latency (CL16 vs CL17)
vs
Price per GB
CA$28.627βœ“
Best price
Out of stock
Capacity
32GB
Modules
2Γ—16GB
Speed
4,266 MT/sβœ“
Latency
8.0 nsβœ“
Key specs advantage
+46% Price per GB (CA$28.627 vs CA$41.813)
+7% Speed (4,266 MT/s vs 4,000 MT/s)

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB: full breakdown

Value: price per gigabyte

There is no price-per-GB winner in this comparison: every kit is out of stock, and an out-of-stock price is not a value. On the last prices recorded, the figures were G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB at CA$41.813/GB and G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB at CA$28.627/GB.

Capacity and module layout

The G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is 2x16GB and the G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB is 2x16GB. Every kit here totals 32GB, so capacity is not the deciding factor. All of them ship as matched multi-module sets, so each populates at least two channels out of the box; on a four-slot board that still leaves room to add capacity later.

Speed and latency

Clocks and timings: the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB at 4,000 MT/s CL16 and the G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB at 4,266 MT/s CL17. The G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB clocks highest at 4,266 MT/s, 7% above the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB at 4,000 MT/s. True latency, where lower is better, favours the G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB at 8 ns against 8 ns on the G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB. That is the figure that settles a higher-CAS-at-higher-clock argument; MT/s or CAS on its own does not.

Current price against MSRP

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB and G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB are out of stock, so those prices are the last recorded rather than something you can pay today. No MSRP is on file for any of these kits, so street price is the only reference point.

Which of these 2 kits should you buy?

No recommendation today: every one of the 2 kits compared is out of stock, and a price-per-GB figure nobody can pay is not a value. On paper the G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB is the quickest at 4,266 MT/s, so it is the one to watch for. Wait for stock before committing β€” the price-per-GB order can change the moment one of them is listed again.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Capacity & Modules

Capacity & Modules comparison between G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
Total capacity32GBβœ“32GB
Module layout2Γ—16GB2Γ—16GB
Module count22
Form factorUDIMMUDIMM
Categorydesktopdesktop

Speed & Latency

Speed & Latency comparison between G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Speed4,000 MT/s4,266 MT/sβœ“
CAS latencyCL16βœ“CL17
True latency8.0 ns8.0 nsβœ“

Features

Features comparison between G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
ECC supportNoNo
RGB lightingYesYes

Pricing & Value

Pricing & Value comparison between G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, G.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
SpecificationG.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GBG.Skill Trident Z Royal DDR4-4266 2x16GB
MSRPβ€”β€”
Best priceOut of stockOut of stock
Price per GBCA$41.813CA$28.627βœ“

← Build a different comparison